 |
at Global Oneness Community.
Share your dreams and let others help you with the interpretation!
Dream Sharing Forum
|
 |
Trial | A Wisdom Archive on Trial |  | Trial A selection of articles related to Trial |  |
| We recommend this article: Trial - 1, and also this: Trial - 2. |
 | |
trial, Trial, trial and error
|  | | | Top | Page 4 » Page 5 « |  |
 | |
| ARTICLES RELATED TO Trial | |  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - Trials of Saddam Hussein - Al-Dujail trialIraqi authorities put Saddam and seven other former Iraqi officials on trial on October 19, 2005 four days after the October 15, 2005 referendum on the new constitution. The tribunal specifically charged the defendants with the killing of 143 Shiites from Dujail, in retaliation for the failed assassination attempt of 8 July 1982. Supporters of Saddam protested against the trial in Tikrit.See also: Trials of Saddam Hussein, Trials of Saddam Hussein - First hearing, Trials of Saddam Hussein - Pre-trial events, Trials of Saddam Hussein - Al-Dujail trial, Trials of Saddam Hussein - Criticism, Trials of Saddam Hussein - Charges, Trials of Saddam Hussein - General arrangements, Trials of Saddam Hussein - Notes and references Read more here: » Trials of Saddam Hussein: Encyclopedia II - Trials of Saddam Hussein - Al-Dujail trial |
|  |
|  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - Nuremberg Trials - Creation of the courtAt the meetings in Tehran (1943), Yalta (1945) and Potsdam (1945), the three major wartime powers USA, USSR and Great Britain agreed on the format to punish those responsible for war-crimes during World War II. France was also awarded a place on the tribunal.
The legal basis for the trial was established by the 'London Charter', issued on August 8, 1945, which restricted the trial to "punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis countries". Thus, accusations of Allied war crimes could not be tried. Some 200 German war cr ...
See also:Nuremberg Trials, Nuremberg Trials - Origin of the trials, Nuremberg Trials - Creation of the court, Nuremberg Trials - Location, Nuremberg Trials - Participants, Nuremberg Trials - The validity of the court, Nuremberg Trials - The main trial, Nuremberg Trials - Influence on the development of international criminal law, Nuremberg Trials - Notes Read more here: » Nuremberg Trials: Encyclopedia II - Nuremberg Trials - Creation of the court |
|  |
| | | | |  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - IG Farben Trial - IndictmentAll defendants were indicted on counts 1, 2, 3, and 5. Only Schneider, Bütefisch, and von der Heyde were charged on count 4, "membership in the SS". The SS had been declared a criminal organization previously by the IMT.
Despite the extensive evidence presented by the prosecution that showed that the company had been deeply involved in Germany's rearmament after World War I from the onset, the tribunal rejected the charges for preparing an aggressive war and for conspiration to that end. On count three ("slave labor"), the judgement ...
See also:IG Farben Trial, IG Farben Trial - Indictment, IG Farben Trial - Defendants Read more here: » IG Farben Trial: Encyclopedia II - IG Farben Trial - Indictment |
|  |
|  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - Track time trial - The HourThe Blue Riband track cycling feat is to break the hour record. Instead of racing against the clock over a set distance, the rider will set out to cover as much distance as possible in exactly 60 minutes.
The world record has been held by many of the greatest names in cycling - most of them road racing specialists with the necessary combination of speed and, above all, endurance - for example: Fausto Coppi, Jacques Anquetil, Eddy Merckx, Francesco Moser, Miguel ...
See also:Track time trial, Track time trial - The Kilo, Track time trial - The Hour, Track time trial - Olympic Sprint Read more here: » Track time trial: Encyclopedia II - Track time trial - The Hour |
|  |
|  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - Trial of Galileo - First meetings with theological authoritiesIn 1615 the attacks seemed to Galileo to have become dangerous, and he determined to go to Rome as soon as his health permitted, as it did at the end of the year. By presenting his case there, he hoped to clear his name of any suspicion of heresy, and to persuade the Church authorities not to suppress heliocentric ideas. In this he was acting against the advice of friends and allies, including Piero Guicciardini, the Tusc ...
See also:Trial of Galileo, Trial of Galileo - Opening of the controversy, Trial of Galileo - First meetings with theological authorities, Trial of Galileo - The Dialogue, Trial of Galileo - The Trial Read more here: » Trial of Galileo: Encyclopedia II - Trial of Galileo - First meetings with theological authorities |
|  |
|  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - Scopes Trial - Appeal to Supreme Court of TennesseeScopes' lawyers appealed, challenging the conviction on several grounds.
First, they argued that the statute was overly vague because it prohibited the teaching of "evolution," a very broad term. The Court rejected that argument, holding:
"Evolution, like prohibition, is a broad term. In recent bickering, however, evolution has been understood to mean the theory which holds that man has developed from some pre-existing lower type. This is the popular significance of evolution, just as the popular significance of prohibition is ...
See also:Scopes Trial, Scopes Trial - Butler Act, Scopes Trial - Testing the Butler Act, Scopes Trial - Textbook in question, Scopes Trial - Trial, Scopes Trial - Cross-examination of Bryan, Scopes Trial - Biblical miracles and creation days, Scopes Trial - Darrow's motivation, Scopes Trial - Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee, Scopes Trial - Publicity and drama, Scopes Trial - Publicity, Scopes Trial - Humor and the Scopes Trial, Scopes Trial - Inherit the Wind' ' Read more here: » Scopes Trial: Encyclopedia II - Scopes Trial - Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee |
|  |
|  |  |  | Trial: Encyclopedia II - Scopes Trial - Appeal to Supreme Court of TennesseeScopes' lawyers appealed, challenging the conviction on several grounds.
First, they argued that the statute was overly vague because it prohibited the teaching of "evolution," a very broad term. The Court rejected that argument, holding:
"Evolution, like prohibition, is a broad term. In recent bickering, however, evolution has been understood to mean the theory which holds that man has developed from some pre-existing lower type. This is the popular significance of evolution, just as the popular significance of prohibition is ...
See also:Scopes Trial, Scopes Trial - Butler Act, Scopes Trial - Testing the Butler Act, Scopes Trial - Textbook in question, Scopes Trial - Trial, Scopes Trial - Cross-examination of Bryan, Scopes Trial - Biblical miracles and creation days, Scopes Trial - Darrow's motivation, Scopes Trial - Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee, Scopes Trial - Publicity and drama, Scopes Trial - Publicity, Scopes Trial - Humor and the Scopes Trial, Scopes Trial - Inherit the Wind Read more here: » Scopes Trial: Encyclopedia II - Scopes Trial - Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee |
|  |
| | | |  | | | Top | Page 4 » Page 5 « |  |
 | |
|
|
Search the Global Oneness web site |
|
|
|