Council of Chalcedon - Latrocinium of Ephesus

The Council of Chalcedon was an ecumenical council that took place from October 8–November 1, 451 at Chalcedon, a city of Bithynia in Asia Minor. It is the fourth of the first seven Ecumenical Councils in Christianity, and is therefore recognized as infallible in its dogmatic definitions by the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. It repudiated the Eutychian doctrine of monophysitism, and set forth the Chalcedonian Creed, which describes the full humanity and full divinity of Jesus, the second person of the Holy Trinity.

• Council of Chalcedon - Historical background
• Council of Chalcedon - Relics of Nestorianism
• Council of Chalcedon - Eutychian controversy
• Council of Chalcedon - Latrocinium of Ephesus
• Council of Chalcedon - Convocation and session
• Council of Chalcedon - Consequences of the council

Read more here: » Council of Chalcedon: Encyclopedia - Council of Chalcedon

By this time, the pope had received communications from Flavian, and had himself determined that Eutyches was in the wrong and that the deposition in 447 was just. He wrote to the council, telling them that they must accept his judgment on the matter, but he left the punishment of Eutyches open for discussion. It appears Pope Leo I was unaware of the confession made to Pope Dioscorus of Alexandria. Theodosius' council convened on August 8, 449, with some 130 bishops in attendance. Dioscorus presided by command of the emperor. The empe ...

See also:

Council of Chalcedon, Council of Chalcedon - Historical background, Council of Chalcedon - Relics of Nestorianism, Council of Chalcedon - Eutychian controversy, Council of Chalcedon - Latrocinium of Ephesus, Council of Chalcedon - Convocation and session, Council of Chalcedon - Consequences of the council

Read more here: » Council of Chalcedon: Encyclopedia II - Council of Chalcedon - Latrocinium of Ephesus

The situation continued to deteriorate, with the pope demanding the convocation of a new council and the emperor refusing to budge, all the while appointing bishops in agreement with Dioscorus. All this changed dramatically with the death of Theodosius II and the elevation of Marcian to the imperial throne, for Marcian was a defender of the doctrine of Flavian and Leo. Marcian agreed to hold a new council, but not in Italy, as the pope had requested, but rather in the East, but he invited the pope to preside in person. He had the exiled bishops returned to their dioceses, and had t ...

See also:

Council of Chalcedon, Council of Chalcedon - Historical background, Council of Chalcedon - Relics of Nestorianism, Council of Chalcedon - Eutychian controversy, Council of Chalcedon - Latrocinium of Ephesus, Council of Chalcedon - Convocation and session, Council of Chalcedon - Consequences of the council

Read more here: » Council of Chalcedon: Encyclopedia II - Council of Chalcedon - Convocation and session

Council of Chalcedon - Relics of Nestorianism. After the Council of Ephesus had condemned Nestorianism, there remained a conflict between patriarchs John of Antioch and Cyril of Alexandria. Cyril claimed that John remained Nestorian in outlook, while John claimed that Cyril held to the Apollinarian heresy. The two settled their differences under the mediation of the bishop of Beroea, Acacius, on April 12, 433. In the following year, Theodoret of Cyrrhus assented to this formu ...

See also:

Council of Chalcedon, Council of Chalcedon - Historical background, Council of Chalcedon - Relics of Nestorianism, Council of Chalcedon - Eutychian controversy, Council of Chalcedon - Latrocinium of Ephesus, Council of Chalcedon - Convocation and session, Council of Chalcedon - Consequences of the council

Read more here: » Council of Chalcedon: Encyclopedia II - Council of Chalcedon - Historical background