 |
|
 |
Begging the question | A Wisdom Archive on Begging the question |  | Begging the question A selection of articles related to Begging the question |  |
|
More material related to Begging The Question can be found here:
|
|
|  | |
begging the question, Begging the question - An example, Begging the question - History, Begging the question - Modern Usage, Begging the question - Related Fallacies, Begging the question - Variations, Fallacy of many questions, Fallacies of definition, Catch 22, Circular definition
|  | |
|
ARTICLES RELATED TO Begging the question | |
|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  | Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Fallacy - Aristotelian fallacies
Fallacy - Material fallacies.
The classification of material fallacies widely adopted by modern logicians and based on that of Aristotle, Organon (Sophistici elenchi), is as follows:
Fallacy of Accident (also called destroying the exception or a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid) meaning to argue erroneously from a general rule to a particular case, without proper regard to particular conditions which vitiate the application of the general rule; e.g. if manhood suffrage be the law, arg ...
See also:Fallacy, Fallacy - Aristotelian fallacies, Fallacy - Material fallacies, Fallacy - Verbal fallacies, Fallacy - Logical fallacies, Fallacy - Other systems of classification, Fallacy - Fallacies in the media and politics, Fallacy - General list of fallacies, Fallacy - General examples, Fallacy - Example 1: Material Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 2: Verbal Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 3: Verbal Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 4: Logical Fallacy Read more here: » Fallacy: Encyclopedia II - Fallacy - Aristotelian fallacies |
|  |
|
 |  |  | Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Fallacy - Fallacies in the media and politicsFallacies are used frequently by pundits in the media and politics. When one politician says to another, "You don't have the moral authority to say X", this could be an example of the argumentum ad hominem or personal attack fallacy; that is, attempting to disprove X, not by addressing validity of X but by attacking the person who asserted X. Arguably, the politician is not even attempting to make an argument against X, but is instead offering a moral rebuke against the interlocutor. For instance, if X is the assertion:
The mili ...
See also:Fallacy, Fallacy - Aristotelian fallacies, Fallacy - Material fallacies, Fallacy - Verbal fallacies, Fallacy - Logical fallacies, Fallacy - Other systems of classification, Fallacy - Fallacies in the media and politics, Fallacy - General list of fallacies, Fallacy - General examples, Fallacy - Example 1: Material Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 2: Verbal Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 3: Verbal Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 4: Logical Fallacy Read more here: » Fallacy: Encyclopedia II - Fallacy - Fallacies in the media and politics |
|  |
|
 |  |  | Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Fallacy - General examplesFallacious arguments involve not only formal logic but also causality. Others involve psychological ploys such as use of power relationships between proposer and interlocutor, appeals to patriotism and morality, appeals to ego etc., to establish necessary intermediate (explicit or implicit) premises for an argument. Indeed, fallacies very often lay in unstated assumptions or implied premises in arguments that are not always obvious at first glance. One wa ...
See also:Fallacy, Fallacy - Aristotelian fallacies, Fallacy - Material fallacies, Fallacy - Verbal fallacies, Fallacy - Logical fallacies, Fallacy - Other systems of classification, Fallacy - Fallacies in the media and politics, Fallacy - General list of fallacies, Fallacy - General examples, Fallacy - Example 1: Material Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 2: Verbal Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 3: Verbal Fallacy, Fallacy - Example 4: Logical Fallacy Read more here: » Fallacy: Encyclopedia II - Fallacy - General examples |
|  |
|
 |  |  | Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Begging the question - Related fallaciesBegging the question is related to the Fallacy of Circular Reasoning. The distinction between the two concepts is as follows: Circular Reasoning is the basing of two conclusions each upon the other (or possibly with more intermediate steps). That is, if you follow a chain of arguments, one of the conclusions is presumed by an earlier conclusion. Begging the question can occur within one argument and consequent conclusion. In the strictest sense, Begging the question occurs if and only if the conclusion is implicitly or explicitly a component of an immediate premise. It is usually accepted, though, to use the term ...
See also:Begging the question, Begging the question - History, Begging the question - An example, Begging the question - Variations, Begging the question - Related fallacies, Begging the question - Modern usage Read more here: » Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Begging the question - Related fallacies |
|  |
|
|
 |  |  | Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Begging the question - HistoryThe term was translated into English from the Latin in the 16th century. The Latin version, Petitio Principii (petitio: petition, request; principii, genitive of principium: beginning, basis, premise of an argument), literally means "a request for the beginning or premise." That is, the premise depends on the truth of the very matter in question.
The Latin phrase comes from the Greek en archei aiteisthai in Aristotle's Prior Analytics II xvi:
"Begging or assuming the point at issue consi ...
See also:Begging the question, Begging the question - History, Begging the question - An example, Begging the question - Variations, Begging the question - Related fallacies, Begging the question - Modern usage Read more here: » Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Begging the question - History |
|  |
|
|
|
 |  |  | Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Begging the question - Related FallaciesBegging the question is related to the Fallacy of Circular Reasoning. The distinction between the two concepts is as follows: Circular Reasoning is the basing of two conclusions each upon the other (or possibly with more intermediate steps). That is, if you follow a chain of arguments, one of the conclusions is presumed by an earlier conclusion. Begging the question can occur within one argument and consequent conclusion. In the strictest sense, Begging the question occurs if and only if the conclusion is implicitly or explicitly a component of an immediate premise. It is usually accepted, though, to use the term ...
See also:Begging the question, Begging the question - History, Begging the question - An example, Begging the question - Variations, Begging the question - Related Fallacies, Begging the question - Modern Usage Read more here: » Begging the question: Encyclopedia II - Begging the question - Related Fallacies |
|  |
|
 | |
|
|
More material related to Begging The Question can be found here:
|
|
|
 | |