 |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
at Global Oneness Community.
Share your dreams and let others help you with the interpretation!
Dream Sharing Forum
|
 |
Hom functor - Formal definition |  | Hom functor - Formal definition: Encyclopedia II - Hom functor - Formal definition |  | Let C be a locally small category (i.e. a category for which Hom-classes are actually sets and not proper classes). For all objects A in C we define a functor
Hom(A,–) : C → Set
to the category of sets as follows:
Hom(A,–) maps each object X in C to the set of morphisms, Hom(A, X)
Hom(A,–) maps each morphism f : X → Y to the function Hom(A, f) : Hom(A, X ...
See also:Hom functor, Hom functor - Formal definition, Hom functor - Yoneda's lemma |  | | Hom functor, Hom functor - Formal definition, Hom functor - Yoneda's lemma, representable functor |  | |
|  |  | Hom functor: Encyclopedia II - Hom functor - Formal definition
Hom functor - Formal definition
Let C be a locally small category (i.e. a category for which Hom-classes are actually sets and not proper classes). For all objects A in C we define a functor
Hom(A,–) : C → Set
to the category of sets as follows:
- Hom(A,–) maps each object X in C to the set of morphisms, Hom(A, X)
- Hom(A,–) maps each morphism f : X → Y to the function Hom(A, f) : Hom(A, X) → Hom(A, Y) given by .
For each object B in C we define a contravariant functor
Hom(–,B) : C → Set
as follows:
- Hom(–,B) maps each object X in C to the set of morphisms, Hom(X, B)
- Hom(–,B) maps each morphism h : X → Y to the function Hom(h, B) : Hom(Y, B) → Hom(X, B) given by .
Note that fixing the first argument of Hom naturally gives rise to a covariant functor and fixing the second argument naturally gives a contravariant functor. This is an artifact of the way in which one must compose the morphisms.
The pair of functors Hom(A,–) and Hom(–,B) are obviously related in a natural manner. For any pair of morphisms f : B → B′ and h : A′ → A and the following diagram commutes:
Both paths send g : A → B to f ∘ g ∘ h.
The commutativity of the above diagram implies that Hom(–,–) is a bifunctor from C × C to Set which is contravariant in the first argument and covariant in the second. Equivalently, we may say that Hom(–,–) is a covariant bifunctor
Hom(–,–) : Cop × C → Set
where Cop is the opposite category to C.
Other related archivesCategory theory, Hom-sets, Yoneda's lemma, category, category of sets, category theory, commutes, contravariant functor, faithful, full, function, functor, functor category, functors, locally small category, mathematics, morphisms, natural transformation, opposite category, proper classes, representable functor, sets
 Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Formal definition", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki |
|
|
More material related to Hom Functor can be found here:
|
|
« Back
|
Search the Global Oneness web site |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sneak-Peek of Global Oneness Community
Hi friend! The Global Oneness Community, the place for information and sharing about Oneness is not really launched yet (you will see there is still some clean up to do) ...but it is now open for a sneak-peek! And if you wish - please register and become one of the very first members to do so! Jonas
Forum Home,
Articles,
Photo Gallery,
Videos,
News,
Sitemap
...and much more!
|