 | Zoophilia: Encyclopedia II - Zoophilia - Perspectives on zoophilia
Zoophilia - Perspectives on zoophilia
Zoophilia - Psychological and research perspectives
DSM-III-R (APA, 1987) stated that sexual contact with animals is almost never a clinically significant problem by itself (Cerrone, 1991), and therefore both this and the later DSM-IV (APA, 1994) subsumed it under the residual classification "paraphilias not otherwise specified".
The first detailed studies of zoophilia date from prior to 1910. Peer reviewed research into zoophilia in its own right has happened since around 1960. There have been several significant modern studies, from Masters (1962) to Beetz (2002), but each of them has drawn and agreed on several broad conclusions:
- The critical aspect to study was emotion, relationship, and motive, it is important not to just assess or judge the sexual act alone in isolation, or as "an act", without looking deeper. (Masters, Miletski, Beetz)
- Zoophiles' emotions and care to animals can be real, relational, authentic and (within animals' abilities) reciprocal, and not just a substitute or means of expression. (Masters, Miletski, Weinberg, Beetz)
- Most zoophiles have (or have also had) long term human relationships as well or at the same time as zoosexual ones. (Masters, Beetz)
- Society in general at present is considerably misinformed about zoophilia, its stereotypes, and its meaning (Masters, Miletski, Weinberg, Beetz)
- Contrary to popular belief, there is in fact significant popular or "latent" interest in zoophilia, either in fantasy, animal mating, or reality (Nancy Friday, Massen, Masters)
- The distinction between zoophilia and zoosadism is a critical one, and highlighted by each of these studies.
- Masters (1962), Miletski (1999) and Weinberg (2003) each comment significantly on the social harm caused by these, and other common misunderstandings: "This destroy[s] the lives of many citizens".
At times, research has been cited based upon the degree of zoosexual or zoosadistic related history within populations of juvenile and other persistent offenders, prison populations with records of violence, and people with prior psychological issues. Such studies are not viewed professionally as valid means to research or profile zoophilia, as the results would be based upon populations pre-selected as knowingly having high proportions of criminal records, abusive tendencies and/or psychological issues. This approach (used in some older research and quoted to demonstrate pathology) is considered discredited and unrepresentative by researchers.
An example of such a statistic is a statement that "96% of people who commit bestiality will go on to commit crimes against people" quoted by PETA [4], which is sourced from a study of such a population [5] . When read in full however, the study also includes the following caution regarding interpretation of their results: "It is difficult to assess 'normality' in a study where all 381 participants were adjudicated juvenile offenders living in state facilities ... It is possible that among other populations ... sex acts with animals might be performed out of love, the need for consolation, or other motivations. In these and other populations, there might not be any link whatsoever to offenses against humans." This qualification is not mentioned by PETA.
Zoophilia - Religious perspectives
Most organized religions take a critical or sometimes condemnatory view of zoophilia or zoosexuality, with some variation and exceptions.
- Passages in Leviticus 18:23 ("And you shall not lie with any beast and defile yourself with it, neither shall any woman give herself to a beast to lie with it: it is a perversion." RSV) and 20:15-16 ("If a man lies with a beast, he shall be put to death; and you shall kill the beast. If a woman approaches any beast and lies with it, you shall kill the woman and the beast; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them." RSV) are cited by Jewish, Christian, and Muslim theologians as categorical denunciation of bestiality. Some theologians (especially Christian[6]) extend this, to consider lustful thoughts for an animal as a sin. Alternatively, many Christians and some non-Orthodox Jews do not regard the full Levitical laws as binding upon them, and may consider them irrelevant. Some zoophiles take this injunction to indicate that sex with animals in the missionary position is forbidden, but that other positions are not specifically mentioned nor apparently against the divine will.
- Views of its seriousness in Islam seem to cover a wide spectrum. This may be because it is not explicitly mentioned or prohibited in the Qur'an, or because sex and sexuality were not treated as taboo in Muslim society to the same degree as in Christianity. Some sources claim that sex with animals is abhorrent, others state that while condemned, it is treated with "relative indulgence" and in a similar category to masturbation and lesbianism (Bouhdiba: Sexuality in Islam, Ch.4 link). A book "Tahrirolvasyleh", cited on the Internet, which quotes the Ayatollah Khomeini approving of sex with animals under certain conditions, is unconfirmed and possibly a forgery.
- There are several references in Hindu scriptures to religious figures engaging in sexual activity with animals (e.g. the god Brahma lusting after and having sex with a bear, a human-like sage being born to a deer mother), and actual Vedic rituals involving zoosexual activity (see Ashvamedha), as well as explicit depictions of people having sex with animals included amongst the thousands of sculptures of "Life events" on the exterior of the temple complex at Khajuraho. Orthodox Hindu doctrine holds that sex should be restricted to married couples, thereby forbidding zoosexual acts. A greater punishment is attached to sexual relations with a sacred cow than with other animals. However, the Tantric sect of Hinduism makes use of ritual sexual practices, which could include sexual contact with animals.
- Buddhism addresses sexual conduct primarily in terms of what brings harm to oneself or to others, and the admonition against sexual misconduct is generally interpreted in modern times to prohibit zoosexual acts, as well as pederasty, adultery, rape, or prostitution. Various sexual activities, including those with animals, are expressly forbidden for Buddhist monks and nuns.
- In the Church of Satan, sexual acts involving children and/or animals are universally condemned, as are those in which a human who is too naive to understand is involved. The Satanic Bible states (p.66) that animals and children are treated as sacred as they are regarded as the most natural expression of life.
Zoophilia - Animal studies perspectives
(Main article: Non-human animal sexuality)
The common concept of animals as heterosexual and only interested in their own species, is seen as scientifically inaccurate by researchers into animal behavior. Animals are in the main, considered as sexual opportunists by science, rather than sexually naive. Ethologists such as Desmond Morris who study animal behavior, as well as formal studies, have consistently documented significant homosexuality in a wide range of animals, apparently freely chosen or in the presence of the opposite gender, as well as homosexual animal couples, homosexual raising of young, and cross-species sexual advances. Peter Singer reports of one such incident witnessed by Biruté Galdikas (a notable ethologist considered by many the world's foremost authority on primates):
"While walking through the camp with Galdikas, my informant was suddenly seized by a large male orangutan, his intentions made obvious by his erect penis. Fighting off so powerful an animal was not an option, but Galdikas called to her companion not to be concerned, because the orangutan would not harm her, and adding, as further reassurance, that "they have a very small penis." As it happened, the orangutan lost interest before penetration took place, but the aspect of the story that struck me most forcefully was that in the eyes of someone who has lived much of her life with orangutans, to be seen by one of them as an object of sexual interest is not a cause for shock or horror. The potential violence of the orangutan's come-on may have been disturbing, but the fact that it was an orangutan making the advances was not." [7]
Zoophilia - Animal rights and welfare concerns
One of the primary critiques of zoophilia is the argument that zoosexuality is harmful to animals. Some state this categorically; that any sexual activity is necessarily abuse. Critics also point to examples in which animals were clearly abused, having been tied up, assaulted, or injured. Defenders of zoophilia argue that animal abuse is neither typical of nor commonplace within zoophilia, and that just as sexual activity with humans can be both abusive and not, so can sexual activity with animals.
Andrea M. Beetz, Ph. D in her book on sex and violence with animals (2002) reports: "In most [popular] references to bestiality, violence towards the animal is automatically implied. That sexual approaches to animals may not need force or violence but rather, sensitivity, or knowledge of animal behavior, is rarely taken into consideration."
In comment on Peter Singer's article "Heavy Petting", which controversially argued that zoosexuality need not be abusive and if so loving relationships could form, Ingrid Newkirk, then president of the American animal rights group PETA, added this endorsement: "If a girl gets sexual pleasure from riding a horse, does the horse suffer? If not, who cares? If you French kiss your dog and he or she thinks it's great, is it wrong? We believe all exploitation and abuse is wrong. If it isn't exploitation and abuse, [then] it may not be wrong."
(A few years later, Newkirk wrote to the editor of the Canada Free Press in response to a column by Alexander Rubin, making clear that she was strongly opposed to any exploitation, and all sexual activity, with animals. This was necessary since some had sought to interpret her former statement as condoning zoosexuality. Accordingly, the response was a clarification of her position regarding zoosexual acts, rather than a different response per se to Singer's actual philosophical point, namely "if it isn't exploitation and abuse [then is there any moral basis for objecting?]")
Ernest Bornemann (1990, cited by Rosenbauer 1997) coined the separate term "zoosadism" for those who derive pleasure from inflicting pain on an animal, sometimes with a sexual component. Some extreme examples of zoosadism include necrozoophilia, the sexual enjoyment of killing animals (similar to "lust murder" in humans), sexual penetration of fowl such as hens (fatal in itself) and strangling at orgasm, mutilation, sexual assault with objects (including screwdrivers and knives), interspecies rape, and sexual assault on immature animals such as puppies. Some horse-ripping incidents have a sexual connotation (Schedel-Stupperich, 2001). The link between sadistic sexual acts with animals and sadistic practices with humans or lust murders has been heavily researched. Some murderers tortured animals in their childhood and also sexual relations with animals occurred. Ressler et al. (1986) found that 8 of their sample of 36 sexual murderers showed an interest in zoosexual acts. (Main article: Zoosadism)
Sexology information sites (if sufficiently detailed) are usually careful to distinguish zoosadism from zoophilia: Humboldt Berlin University Sexology Dept (list of paraphilias) sex-lexis.com and sexualcounselling.com.
Zoophilia - Historical and cultural perspectives
Main article: Historical and cultural perspectives on zoophilia
Other related archives1920s, 1950s, 1969, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2005, A Midsummer Night's Dream, AIDS, American, American Psychiatric Association, Americans, Animal love, Ashvamedha, Australia, Australian Capital Territory, Ayatollah Khomeini, BDSM, Baal, Balzac, Beauty and the Beast, Biruté Galdikas, Bodil Joensen, Borat, Brahma, Brucellosis, Buddhism, Canada, Catherine the Great, Chessie Moore, Christian, Church of Satan, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, DSM-IV (TR), Denmark, Desmond Morris, Dutch, East Germany, Enumclaw, Environment, choice, and sexual orientation, Ernest Bornemann, Ethologists, Europa, Family Guy, French, French kiss, Ganymede, Geek Code, German, Germany, God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, Great Dane, Greek, Greek mythology, Helen, Hindu, Historical and cultural perspectives on zoophilia, Home Office, Howard Stern, Hungary, Internet, Islam, January 20, Jeremy Jaynes, Jerry Springer, Jervis Bay Territory, Jewish, John Irving, John Travers, Khajuraho, King Kong, Kinsey Reports, Kinsey reports, Klingons, Krafft-Ebing, Kurt Vonnegut, Latent, Lawrence v. Texas, Leda, Leviticus, Linda Lovelace, Loki, Lucius Apuleius, Mabel Stark, Miller Test, Minotaur, Monogamy, Muslim, Muth v. Frank, My Secret Garden, Nancy Friday, Netherlands, New Zealand, Non-human animal sexuality, Norse mythology, OFCOM, Omaha the Cat Dancer, PETA, Pan, Paraphilia, Pasiphae, Peleus, Peruvian, Peter Singer, Philip Buble, Polydeuces, Pornography, Qur'an, Recurring themes, Roman, Russia, Sagaholm, Screwed the Pooch, Sexual Offences Act 2003, Sexual fantasies, Sexual orientation, Slaughterhouse Five, Sleipnir, South Park, Star Trek, TGPs, Tantric, The Book of One Thousand and One Nights, The Cider House Rules, The Golden Ass, The Sirens of Titan, Thetis, Tom Lehrer, Toronto, U.S. states, Ugaritic, United Kingdom, United States, United States v. Extreme Associates, Vedic, Vulcans, Washington, West Germany, William Shakespeare, Xfm London, Zeus, Zoosadism, adultery, alpaca, alternate lifestyles, alternative lifestyle, anally penetrated, animal abuse, animal lovers, animal rights, animal transformation fantasies and roleplays, animals, anime, anthropomorphism, anthropomorphs, bull, bulletin boards, cartoon, classical, comic book, context, denial, edgeplay, elves, exploitation films, faded and closed, female sexuality, forums, fur fetishism, furries, furry, fursuiting, gay community, genre, googling, guilt, hate crime, heifer, human, incident, infections, instant messenger, internet, jealousy, lesbianism, llama, loving relationship, lust murder, lustful, manga, masturbation, mate, mental health, missionary position, necrophilia, necrozoophilia, networking, newsgroup, obscene, offline, orgasm, other species, outing, paraphilia, paraphilias, pathology, pederasty, perceptions in other sexual groups, pornographers, pornography, primates, prostitution, psychology, puberty, puppy or pony play, rape, religion, reunification, satirical comedy, sexual assault, sexual attraction, sexual intercourse, sexual roleplays, social networks, sociology, sodomy, spammers, speciesism, stuffed animals, swan, taboo, talkers, temple complex, tentacle rape, the closet, therians, unconstitutional, urban myth, watershed, websites, zoonoses, zoosadism, §175b
 Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Perspectives on zoophilia", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki |
