Home Forums Blogs Articles Photos Videos Contact FAQ

Teleology - Classical Greek teleology

Teleology - Classical Greek teleology: Encyclopedia II - Teleology - Classical Greek teleology

Plato summarized the argument for teleology as follows in Phaedo, arguing that it is error to fail to distinguish between the ultimate Cause, and the mere means by which the ultimate Cause acts: "Imagine not being able to distinguish the real cause from that without which the cause would not be able to act as a cause. It is what the majority appear to do, like people groping in the dark; they call it a cause, thus giving it a name that does not belong to it. That is why one man surrounds the earth with a vortex to make the heave ...

Teleology: Encyclopedia II - Teleology - Classical Greek teleology

Teleology - Classical Greek teleology

Plato summarized the argument for teleology as follows in Phaedo, arguing that it is error to fail to distinguish between the ultimate Cause, and the mere means by which the ultimate Cause acts:

"Imagine not being able to distinguish the real cause from that without which the cause would not be able to act as a cause. It is what the majority appear to do, like people groping in the dark; they call it a cause, thus giving it a name that does not belong to it. That is why one man surrounds the earth with a vortex to make the heavens keep it in place, another makes the air support it like a wide lid. As for their capacity of being in the best place they could possibly be put, this they do not look for, nor do they believe it to have any divine force, but they believe that they will some time discover a stronger and more immortal Atlas to hold everything together more, and they do not believe that the truly good and "binding" binds and holds them together. (Plato, Phaedo 99bc)

Thus, it is argued, those who attempt to explain nature in terms of nature alone are forced to deny the ultimate binding Good in the universe, and hope that they will someday discover a "stronger and more immortal Atlas" to hold their universe together.

Similarly, Aristotle argued that it is error to attempt to reduce all things to mere necessity, because such thinking neglects the purpose, order, and final cause that causes the apparent necessity. He wrote:

"Democritus, however, neglecting the final cause, reduces to necessity all the operations of nature. Now they are necessary, it is true, but yet they are for a final cause and for the sake of what is best in each case. Thus nothing prevents the teeth from being formed and being shed in this way; but it is not on account of these causes but on account of the end; these are causes in the sense of being the moving and efficient instruments and the material. …to say that necessity is the cause is much as if we should think that the water has been drawn off from a dropsical patient on account of the lancet alone, not on account of health, for the sake of which the lancet made the incision." Aristotle, Generation of Animals V.8, 789a8-b15

Other related archives

20th Century, Adorno, Aristotle, Darwin, Descartes, Destiny, Dysteleology, Ethica, Francis Bacon, Hegel, Horkheimer, Intrinsic finality, Lucretius, Lukács, Marx, Moirae, Naturalism (philosophy), Orthogenesis, Phaedo, Plato, Spinoza, Teleological argument, analytic philosophy, anthropic, final cause, intelligent design, philosophical, philosophical naturalism, science, superstition, teleological argument

Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Classical Greek teleology", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

More material related to Teleology can be found here:

Main Page
for
Teleology Index of Articles
related to
Teleology