 |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
at Global Oneness Community.
Share your dreams and let others help you with the interpretation!
Dream Sharing Forum
|
 |
Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science |  | Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science: Encyclopedia II - Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science |  | Flood geology is a part of the broader endeavor of creation science, particularly being associated with proponents of Young Earth creationism. Flood geology adherents support their views with geological field work that they believe gives strong evidence of a universal flood, and they invariably profess a literal belief in the Biblical record as their baseline for research.
Mainstream science does not consider the young earth biblical interpretation of a global flood and associated deluge mythology to be a valid scientific theory. Alth ...
See also:Flood geology, Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science, Flood geology - Origins of flood geology, Flood geology - The revival of flood geology, Flood geology - Processes, Flood geology - Liquefaction, Flood geology - Submarine canyon formation, Flood geology - Fossilization, Flood geology - Fossil fuels, Flood geology - Fossil layering, Flood geology - Frozen mammoths, Flood geology - Proposed mechanisms of the flood, Flood geology - Reliability of Genesis, Flood geology - Comparison with mainstream geology, Flood geology - Age of the Earth, Flood geology - Counterpoints, Flood geology - Water source, Flood geology - Geological evidence, Flood geology - Archaeological evidence, Flood geology - Paleontological evidence, Flood geology - Grass evidence, Flood geology - Philosophical objections |  | | Flood geology, Flood geology - Age of the Earth, Flood geology - Archaeological evidence, Flood geology - Comparison with mainstream geology, Flood geology - Counterpoints, Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science, Flood geology - Fossil fuels, Flood geology - Fossil layering, Flood geology - Fossilization, Flood geology - Frozen mammoths, Flood geology - Geological evidence, Flood geology - Grass evidence, Flood geology - Liquefaction, Flood geology - Origins of flood geology, Flood geology - Paleontological evidence, Flood geology - Philosophical objections, Flood geology - Processes, Flood geology - Proposed mechanisms of the flood, Flood geology - Reliability of Genesis, Flood geology - Submarine canyon formation, Flood geology - The revival of flood geology, Flood geology - Water source, Baraminology, Creation biology, Creation science, Frank Lewis Marsh, Pre-Adamite, Pseudoscience |  | |
|  |  | Flood geology: Encyclopedia II - Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science
Flood geology - Flood geology versus mainstream science
Flood geology is a part of the broader endeavor of creation science, particularly being associated with proponents of Young Earth creationism. Flood geology adherents support their views with geological field work that they believe gives strong evidence of a universal flood, and they invariably profess a literal belief in the Biblical record as their baseline for research.
Mainstream science does not consider the young earth biblical interpretation of a global flood and associated deluge mythology to be a valid scientific theory. Although flood geology was widely supported by early practitioners of geology and geosciences, it was contradicted by many scientific discoveries of the first half of the 19th century and it was abandoned as a serious scientific hypothesis by the middle of the century. It was revived in the early 20th century as part of the growth of the Christian fundamentalist movement in the United States.
Many scientific objections have been raised concerning the proposed mechanics of flood geology, which often require the suspension of basic laws of physics - something which mainstream science sees as being extremely improbable. A massive flood of the size suggested by creation geologists is extremely difficult to reconcile with basic physical laws. In particular, the amount of water required to cover the Earth's entire surface is enormous and no naturalistic mechanism proposed to explain where it came from or where it went will satisfy mainstream proponents. The mechanisms proposed by creationists to account for the fossil record, lithospheric layering, and tectonic formations are rejected by the vast majority of geological scientists. In short, mainstream geologists consider it to be pseudoscience as do old earth creationists.
Note that flood geology should not be confused with episodic catastophism as observed by geologists and earth scientists at many locations throughout the Earth's five billion year natural history. Such confusion surrounded the observations of the geologist J. Harlan Bretz who discovered the Missoula Floods in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. His observations and theories were rejected out of hand by mainstream geologists and scientists on the basis that catastrophism was not science, but rather religion. The Earth's physical history is replete with catastrophic events that can be misconstrued this way.
Other related archives... in public education, 1779, 1837, 18th century, 1923, 1961, 19th century, 20th century, 2nd century AD, 4.5 billion years old, 5th century, Abraham, Adam, Amazon, Answers in Genesis, Ararat, Associated articles, Augustine of Hippo, Baraminology, Bible, Black Sea, Book of Genesis, Brachiosaurus, Buffon, Carboniferous Period, Charles Lyell, Chinese, Christian, Christian fundamentalist, Christian fundamentalist movement, Christianity, Church of England, Congo, Cotes, Creation Research Society, Creation biology, Creation in Genesis, Creation science, Creation vs. evolution, Cretaceous Period, Czech, Derham, Diplodocus, Dutch, Earth, Fall of Man, Frank Lewis Marsh, French, Ganges, Genealogies of Genesis, Genesis, Geologic time scale, George McCready Price, Georgia, German, Great Britain, Great Flood, Henry M. Morris, History of Egypt, History of creationism, Hudson, Hydroplates, Ice Age, Institute for Creation Research, Intelligent design, Intelligent design movement, Islamic creationism, James Hutton, James Ussher, Japanese, Korean, La Brea Tar Pits, Laplace, Liquefaction, Louis Agassiz, Masoretic, Mesopotamia, Missoula Floods, Modern geocentrism, Mosaic, Mutation, Neo-Creationism, Newton, Occam's Razor, Old Earth creationism, Omphalos creationism, Oxford University, Pacific Northwest, Pangaea, Peleg, Plate Tectonics, Portuguese, Pre-Adamite, Progressive creationism, Pseudoscience, Roman Catholic Church, Russian, Scientific creationists, Seventh-day Adventist, Spanish, Stone Mountain, Subduction, Swiss, Teach the Controversy, Theistic evolution, Tyrannosaurus rex, United States, Ussher-Lightfoot Calendar, Walt Brown, William Buckland, William Whiston, Word of God, Young Earth creationism, a literal belief in the Biblical record, a priori, age of the Earth, agnosticism, anthropology, aquifers, atheism, behaviorism, biostratigraphy, carbon dating, coal, communism, connate fluids, continental shelf, creation geologists, creation science, creation scientists, creation-evolution controversy, creationist, crust, debate, deluge mythology, diffusion, dinosaurs, discontinuities, dwarf mammoths, earthquakes, eons, epochs, eras, erosion, erratic boulders, evangelism, evidence, extraterrestrial impact events, famous chronology, fascism, faunal stages, fossil, fossil fuel, fossil fuels, fossil record, fossilization, fossils, geologic, geological formations, geological history, geology, geosciences, global flood, gravel, here, humanism, ice age, index fossils, law of superposition, libertarianism, limestone, liquefaction, lithification, lithosphere, lithospheric layering, loam, mammoths, mantle, mineral, natural history, oil, overburden (or lithostatic) pressure, periods, philosophical naturalism, physical laws, planetary science, pseudoscience, quicksand, racism, radioactive decay, radiometric dating, rock, salt domes, science, scientific community, scientific theory, sea levels, second law of thermodynamics, sediment, sedimentary rock, sedimentary strata, settle, socialism, submarine canyons, supervolcanic activity, suspension, tectonic, tectonic formations, uniformitarianism, vapor canopy, young Earth creationism
 Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Flood geology versus mainstream science", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki |
|
|
More material related to Flood Geology can be found here:
|
|
« Back
|
Search the Global Oneness web site |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sneak-Peek of Global Oneness Community
Hi friend! The Global Oneness Community, the place for information and sharing about Oneness is not really launched yet (you will see there is still some clean up to do) ...but it is now open for a sneak-peek! And if you wish - please register and become one of the very first members to do so! Jonas
Forum Home,
Articles,
Photo Gallery,
Videos,
News,
Sitemap
...and much more!
|