 |
|
| |
|
|
|
at Global Oneness Community.
Share your dreams and let others help you with the interpretation!
Dream Sharing Forum
|
|
Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence | | Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence: Encyclopedia II - Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence | | It is recognised that not all evidence is made accessible, that this can limit the effectiveness of any approach, and that effort to reduce various publication and retrieval biases is required.
Failure to publish negative trials is the most obvious gap, and moves to register all trials at the outset, and then to pursue their results are underway. Changes in publication methods, particularly related to the Web should reduce the difficulty of getting a paper on a trial that concludes ...
See also:Evidence-based medicine, Evidence-based medicine - Overview, Evidence-based medicine - History, Evidence-based medicine - Qualification of evidence, Evidence-based medicine - Categories of recommendations, Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence, Evidence-based medicine - Criticism of evidence-based medicine, Evidence-based medicine - Note | | | Evidence-based medicine, Evidence-based medicine - Categories of recommendations, Evidence-based medicine - Criticism of evidence-based medicine, Evidence-based medicine - History, Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence, Evidence-based medicine - Note, Evidence-based medicine - Overview, Evidence-based medicine - Qualification of evidence, Adverse drug reaction, Adverse effect (medicine), Clinical trials with surprising outcomes, Consensus (medical), Guideline (medical), History of medicine, Medical algorithm, Medical research, Systematic Reviews | | |
| | | Evidence-based medicine: Encyclopedia II - Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence
Evidence-based medicine - Limitations of available evidence
It is recognised that not all evidence is made accessible, that this can limit the effectiveness of any approach, and that effort to reduce various publication and retrieval biases is required.
Failure to publish negative trials is the most obvious gap, and moves to register all trials at the outset, and then to pursue their results are underway. Changes in publication methods, particularly related to the Web should reduce the difficulty of getting a paper on a trial that concludes it did not prove anything new, including its starting hypothesis, published.
Other related archivesAdverse drug reaction, Adverse effect (medicine), Archie Cochrane, Clinical trials with surprising outcomes, Cochrane Collaboration, Consensus (medical), Guideline (medical), History of medicine, Medical algorithm, Medical research, Systematic Reviews, blinding, case-control, cohort, doctors, double-blind, engineering, expert, gold standard, guidelines, healthcare, journal club, medical, meta-analysis, placebo, randomization, randomized, randomized controlled trials, risk-benefit analysis, science, scientific method, statistics, traditions
 Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Limitations of available evidence", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki |
|
|
|
More material related to Evidence-based Medicine can be found here:
|
|
|
« Back
|
Search the Global Oneness web site |
|
|
|
|
|
Sneak-Peek of Global Oneness Community
Hi friend! The Global Oneness Community, the place for information and sharing about Oneness is not really launched yet (you will see there is still some clean up to do) ...but it is now open for a sneak-peek! And if you wish - please register and become one of the very first members to do so! Jonas
Forum Home,
Articles,
Photo Gallery,
Videos,
News,
Sitemap
...and much more!
|
