Home Forums Blogs Articles Photos Videos Contact FAQ

Dhimmi - Modern vs. customary practice

Dhimmi - Modern vs. customary practice: Encyclopedia II - Dhimmi - Modern vs. customary practice

The religious and legal views on the status of dhimmis have historically been a practical issue, but today have become a purely theoretical or theological issue for many Muslim societies. Few if any countries currently have a separate, legally-defined status for dhimmis. Certain Islamist organizations such as Al Qaeda, Taliban, Hamas, and Hizb ut-Tahrir seek to make Islamic law, including dhimma status, applicable in Muslim-majority states. Some Muslim authors present the dhimmi as being equal to Muslims. For example: "Is ...

Dhimmi: Encyclopedia II - Dhimmi - Modern vs. customary practice

Dhimmi - Modern vs. customary practice

Some Muslim authors present the dhimmi as being equal to Muslims. For example:

"Islam does not permit discrimination in the treatment of other human beings on the basis of religion or any other criteria... it emphasises neighborliness and respect for the ties of relationship with non-Muslims ...within this human family, Jews and Christians, who share many beliefs and values with Muslims, constitute what Islam terms Ahl al-Kitab, that is, People of the Scripture, and hence Muslim have a special relationship to them as fellow 'Scriptuaries'."^[4]

Others present the dhimmi as being second-class citizens.:

"In a country ruled by Muslim authorities, a non-Muslim is guaranteed his freedom of faith... Muslims are forbidden from obliging a non-Muslim to embrace Islam, but he should pay the tribute to Muslims readily and submissively, surrender to Islamic laws, and should not practise his polytheistic rituals openly."^[5]

Sayyed Al-Qimni has criticized books used in the curriculum at Al-Azhar University in Cairo and other Islamic universities for teaching that dhimmis should be degraded. For example: "If a dhimmi invites a Muslim to a wedding celebration, he must not go, 'because one must degrade dhimmis...'" 2

Bernard Lewis comments:

Two stereotypes dominate most of what has been written on tolerance and intolerance in the Islamic world. The first depicts a fanatical warrior, an Arab horseman riding out of the desert with a sword in one hand and the Qur'an in the other, offering his victims the choice between the two. This picture […] is not only false but impossible […]. The other image, almost equally preposterous, is that of an interfaith, interracial utopia, in which men and women belonging to different races, professing different creeds, lived side by side in a golden age of unbroken harmony, enjoying equality of rights and of opportunities, and toiling together for the advancement of civilization. Both images are of course wildly distorted; yet both contain, as stereotypes often do, some elements of truth. Two features they have in common are that they are relatively recent, and that they are of Western and not Islamic origin.^[6]

It is only very recently that some defenders of Islam began to assert that their society in the past accorded equal status to non-Muslims. No such claim is made by spokesman for resurgent Islam, and historically there is no doubt that they are right. Traditional Islamic societies neither accorded such equality nor pretended that they were so doing. Indeed, in the old order, this would have been regarded not as a merit but as a dereliction of duty. How could one accord the same treatment to those who follow the true faith and those who willfully reject it? This would be a theological as well as a logical absurdity.

The rank of a full member of society was restricted to free male Muslims. Those who lacked any of these three essential qualifications -- that is, the slave, the woman or the unbeliever -- were not equal. The three basic inequalities of master and slave, man and woman, believer and unbeliever, were not merely admitted; they were established and regulated by holy law.

Other related archives

1979, 1991, Abdul Razzaq, Al Qaeda, Al-Azhar University, Ali, Arabic, Bat Ye'or, Bernard Lewis, Blood money, Cairo, Christians, Devshirme, Egypt, Gentile, Hamas, Hanafi, Hindus, Hizb ut-Tahrir, Ibn Kathir, Iraq, Islam, Islamic, Islamic jurisprudence, Islamism, Islamist, Jews, Jizyah, Kafir, Kharaj, Lahore, Maliki, Mandeans, Minority religion, Mudejar, Muhammad, Muslim, Muslims, Ottoman Empire, Ottoman Millet system, Pact of Umar, People of the Book, Qur'an, Riyadh, Sharia, Sikhs, Spain, Sura, Taliban, Umar II, Umar ibn al-Khattab, Yellow badge, Zoroastrians, blaspheme, bribe, caliph, citation needed, commentary, devshirmeh, discrimination, disputes, exilarchs, geonim, hadith, jizya, jizyah, kharaj, literature, moot, patriarchs, proselytization, societies, zakat

Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Modern vs. customary practice", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

More material related to Dhimmi can be found here:

Main Page
for
Dhimmi Index of Articles
related to
Dhimmi