 |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
at Global Oneness Community.
Share your dreams and let others help you with the interpretation!
Dream Sharing Forum
|
 |
Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation |  | Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation: Encyclopedia II - Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation |  |
Creation according to Genesis - The single account theory.
Some scholars believe that the Genesis account is a report of creation, which is divided into two parts, written from different perspectives: the first part, from 1:1 to 2:3, describes the creation of the Earth from God's perspective; the second part, from 2:4-24, describes the creation of the Garden of Eden from Humanity's perspective. One such scholar wrote, "[T]he strictly complementary nature of the accounts is plain enough: Genesis 1 mentions the cre ...
See also:Creation according to Genesis, Creation according to Genesis - Translation and Authorship, Creation according to Genesis - Mosaic authorship hypothesis, Creation according to Genesis - JEPD authorship hypothesis, Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation, Creation according to Genesis - The single account theory, Creation according to Genesis - The dual account theory, Creation according to Genesis - The dual perspective theory, Creation according to Genesis - Specific issues of textual interpretation, Creation according to Genesis - Literary intent, Creation according to Genesis - In the Beginning, Creation according to Genesis - Timescale, Creation according to Genesis - Use of different words for God, Creation according to Genesis - Writing style, Creation according to Genesis - The likelihood of parallel inconsistent accounts, Creation according to Genesis - The dual perspective theory, Creation according to Genesis - Resources |  | | Creation according to Genesis, Creation according to Genesis - In the Beginning, Creation according to Genesis - JEPD authorship hypothesis, Creation according to Genesis - Literary intent, Creation according to Genesis - Mosaic authorship hypothesis, Creation according to Genesis - Resources, Creation according to Genesis - Specific issues of textual interpretation, Creation according to Genesis - The dual account theory, Creation according to Genesis - The dual perspective theory, Creation according to Genesis - The likelihood of parallel inconsistent accounts, Creation according to Genesis - The single account theory, Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation, Creation according to Genesis - Timescale, Creation according to Genesis - Translation and Authorship, Creation according to Genesis - Use of different words for God, Creation according to Genesis - Writing style, Origin belief |  | |
|  |  | Creation according to Genesis: Encyclopedia II - Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation
Creation according to Genesis - Theories of textual interpretation
Creation according to Genesis - The single account theory
Some scholars believe that the Genesis account is a report of creation, which is divided into two parts, written from different perspectives: the first part, from 1:1 to 2:3, describes the creation of the Earth from God's perspective; the second part, from 2:4-24, describes the creation of the Garden of Eden from Humanity's perspective. One such scholar wrote, "[T]he strictly complementary nature of the accounts is plain enough: Genesis 1 mentions the creation of man as the last of a series, and without any details, whereas in Genesis 2 man is the center of interest and more specific details are given about him and his setting." (Kitchen 116-117).
Creation according to Genesis - The dual account theory
Other scholars, particularly those ascribing to textual criticism and the Documentary hypothesis, believe that the first two chapters of Genesis are two separate accounts of the creation. (They agree that the "first chapter" should include the first three verses of chapter 2.) One such scholar wrote: "The book of Genesis, like the other books of the Hexateuch, was not the production of one author. A definite plan may be traced in the book, but the structure of the work forbids us to consider it as the production of one writer." (Spurell xv). The distinction between the 'two' creation stories is concealed by some translations, such as the New International Version. For some religious writers, such as Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik, the existence of two separate creation stories is beyond doubt, and thus needs to be interpreted as having divine importance.
Creation according to Genesis - The dual perspective theory
Other scholars, such as Pamela Tamarkin Reis, assert that the text can be read either as one account or as two accounts from different perspectives, as the text uses a literary device to describe the same events first from the perspective of God, and second from the perspective of Humanity. According to the documentary hypothesis the existence of two creation stories is the result of the merging of two distinct traditions into one unified text. Literary and linguistic analysis by various authors offer a number of theories concerning modifications and editing which produced the text that exists today. Some readers of the Bible deny that two distinct creation stories exist; they have created a detailed set of religious readings which attempt to show that any differences are only apparent, but not actually real.
Other related archives... in public education, Anderson, Bernhard W., Associated articles, Bible, Chicago, Christianity, Creation science, Creation vs. evolution, Creation vs. evolution debate, Documentary Hypothesis, Documentary hypothesis, Elohim, Genesis, God, Grand Rapids, Harper and Row, History of creationism, Intelligent design, Intelligent design movement, Islam, Islamic creationism, Jesus, John the Evangelist, Joseph Soloveitchik, Joshua, Judaism, Kenneth Kitchen, Kurosawa, Modern geocentrism, Moody, Moses, NY, Names of God in Judaism, Nashville, Neo-Creationism, New International Version, Old Earth creationism, Omphalos creationism, Origin belief, Oxford, Oxford University Press, Philadelphia, Rashomon, Shakespeare, Teach the Controversy, Theistic evolution, Torah, Tyndale, Wheaton, Yahweh, Young Earth creationism, biblical, documentary hypothesis, lapis lazuli, textual criticism, textual critics, theologically conservative, theologically liberal
 Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Theories of textual interpretation", under the G.N U Free Docmentation License. Please also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki |
|
|
More material related to Creation According To Genesis can be found here:
|
|
« Back
|
Search the Global Oneness web site |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sneak-Peek of Global Oneness Community
Hi friend! The Global Oneness Community, the place for information and sharing about Oneness is not really launched yet (you will see there is still some clean up to do) ...but it is now open for a sneak-peek! And if you wish - please register and become one of the very first members to do so! Jonas
Forum Home,
Articles,
Photo Gallery,
Videos,
News,
Sitemap
...and much more!
|